Single- and two-pollutant concentration-response functions for PM and NO for quantifying mortality burden in health impact assessments.
Environmental research 2024 ; 263: 120215.
Chen X, Gehring U, Dyer GMC, Khomenko S, de Hoogh K, Tonne C, Tatah L, Vermeulen R, Khreis H, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Hoek G
DOI : 10.1016/j.envres.2024.120215
PubMed ID : 39448006
PMCID :
URL : https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0013935124021224
Abstract
Health Impact Assessments (HIAs) for air pollutant mixtures are challenging because risk estimates are primarily derived from single-pollutant models. Combining risk estimates from multiple pollutants requires new approaches, as a simple addition of single pollutant risk estimates from correlated air pollutants may result in double counting. We investigated approaches applying concentration-response functions (CRFs) from single- and two-pollutant models in HIAs, focusing on long-term exposure to particulate matter with a diameter less than 2.5 μm (PM) and nitrogen dioxide (NO) and their associations with all-cause mortality.
A systematic literature search of MEDLINE and EMBASE identified cohort studies employing single- and two-pollutant models of long-term exposure to PM and NO with all-cause mortality. Pooled CRFs were calculated through random-effects meta-analyses of risk estimates from single- and two-pollutant models. Coefficient differences were calculated by comparing single- and two-pollutant model estimates. Four approaches to estimating population-attributable fractions (PAFs) were compared: PM or NO single-pollutant models to represent the mixture, the sum of single-pollutant models, the sum of two-pollutant models and the sum of single-pollutant models from a larger body of evidence adjusted by coefficient difference.
Seventeen papers reported both single and two-pollutant estimates. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality from single- and two-pollutant models were 1.053 (95% confidence interval: 1.034-1.071) and 1.035 (1.014-1.057), respectively, for a 5 μg/m increase in PM. HRs for a 10 μg/m increase in NO were 1.032 (1.014-1.049) and 1.024 (1.000-1.049) for single- and two-pollutant models, respectively. The average coefficient difference between single- and two-pollutant models was 0.017 for PM and 0.007 for NO. Combined PAFs for the PM-NO mixture using joint HRs from single- and two-pollutant model CRFs were 0.09 and 0.06, respectively.
Utilizing CRFs from two-pollutant models or applying the coefficient difference to a more extensive evidence base seems to mitigate the potential overestimation of mixture health impacts from adding single-pollutant CRFs.